We’ve been talking about the connection between housing and health for years. But lately, I’ve stopped framing it as a theoretical or future-facing conversation. We’re past that.
Now more than ever, health plans are facing runaway medical costs, provider shortages, and a rapidly aging population, all while navigating an affordability crisis that has made stable housing feel out of reach for millions.
Not long ago, our team worked with a mother who was living in her car with six children. Her story is unfortunately not unique but her outcome was. In partnership with a health plan, we were able to move her family into stable, long-term housing in under 70 days. The results were immediate and profound:
This isn’t anecdotal, it’s replicable and it’s fast. We see this pattern over and over again: Stability in housing leads to stability in health. When health plans work with us, they’re not just checking a box on social determinants they’re investing in real, near-term impact.
Yes, housing has always mattered. But now, we’re at a tipping point. Three converging forces make this moment especially critical:
So what do we do when the care system is overloaded and the housing system is buckling? We go upstream. We shift our mindset from treatment to prevention. From crisis response to stability strategy and forward-thinking health plans are already doing exactly that.
Some plans without making a public show of it are stepping up.
They’re:
These aren’t vanity projects. They’re sustainable, bottom-line-positive programs. And they’re setting the bar for what leadership looks like in our industry.
In short? Insolvency. I know that sounds dramatic but I mean it.
Smaller plans that aren’t adapting are folding or being absorbed under less-than-ideal terms. Even the bigger players are feeling the strain of escalating costs, staffing limitations, and eroding member trust.
Waiting for federal programs to fix the housing crisis? That’s a gamble few can afford. The only real option is to take the reins now, to invest in the social drivers that will keep members healthy and plans solvent.
Let me be clear: housing instability impacts more than just the lowest income brackets.
Whether someone’s net worth is $2 million or $200, housing instability doesn’t discriminate. And neither should our response.
Health plans have an opportunity and an obligation to rethink their role in member well-being.
You can’t control the housing market, but you can control whether you see housing as part of your clinical strategy.
And when you do, the results speak for themselves:
I’ve said it before: we’re not a replacement for health plans. We’re an extension, a second tier to your care management team with the networks and capacity to act where others can’t.
If you’re a health plan leader who knows housing matters but hasn’t yet acted, now’s the moment. Not next year. Not when the next RFP comes around. Not when the data is even more dire. Now. More than ever.